Inventions – Description

DESCRIPTION:
In this module, each team is given the task of inventing, building and demonstrating a working device that performs some unusual task, using cast- aside junk and hardware and simple hand tools as resources. The assigned tasks sound impossible when first presented, yet each assignment has been successfully completed by seventh-graders. By the time they’re done, participants often exceed their expectations of their own capabilities. They also learn about team dynamics by taking an idea full cycle, from conception to “marketed” product in the short span of a few hours.

MISSION:
To have participants work hands-on — to act rather than just think about something. To have fun. To provide the accelerated feedback of taking an idea full cycle in a short period of time. To reveal the dynamics of team creativity. To observe different problem solving styles.

TIMING/TIME REQUIREMENTS:
“The Experience of Invention” can be a stand-alone evening workshop, or used during the Scan phase of a DesignShop. When used in a DesignShop, demonstration of the inventions is usually the last activity of the first day; participants sleep on it and debrief their experience at the start of the following day. The time required is typically as follows: to build the inventions and marketing materials: 2 to 3 hours; demonstration: 3/4 to 1-1/4 hours; debriefing: about 1-1/2 hours.

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS:
Strengths — Invariably, this experience gets participants engaged and excited. It’s fun and revealing. Whether each invention works or doesn’t, the experience is valuable, and provides insights to how people in an organization work together. Weaknesses — It takes a large block of time. It’s not appropriate unless the group can afford the time to look at their own process. Specifications for Success — 1. Be confident that the process is valuable, regardless of the success or failure of individual inventions. (We often learn more from the “failures” than the successes; both are valued). 2. After the demonstrations and presentations, give the teams a few words of validation, then send them home to sleep on it. Don’t engage the group in assessing the experience until the next day. 3. Increase the debriefing time if the results of the inventions went extremely well (breakthrough) or extremely poorly. Adjust the assignments also; for example, it went well, ask for the two or three most important insights; if so-so or poorly, ask for the most important rule or lesson learned.

SPECIAL MATERIALS REQUIRED:
An extensive collection of junk is required, as well as a basic set of (non-powered) hand tools. Collecting the junk is usually spread out over a few days, so that the materials collected one day can be assessed and what’s missing then sought out the next. Smaller items are bundled together into packets; overall, you want about 15 items or packets per participant. Lists are provided. 

Also see how to write an
Inventions exercise 

More from the blog

Innovators are not one instruction.
AI enablement and adoption · Apr 30, 2026
How to Innovate Your Companies Town Hall / All Hands TRY 2
What's a focus group anyways?
The innovation function · Apr 23, 2026
Innovation Workshops/Focus Groups Don’t Work Anymore
AI and your job as a compression
AI enablement and adoption · Apr 20, 2026
From Farm to Factory to… Pontifications from a Dave Gray article

Connect your mission to the breakthrough it needs

Innovation work rarely fails for lack of ideas. It fails when what the program knows is spread across systems that don’t share a record. Bring the program, and we’ll show you where it could run on one.

Contracting vehicles

Direct award pathways, no new competition required.

SBIR Phase III

Under 15 U.S.C. § 638(r)(4), a Phase III award derived from Collaboration.Ai’s prior SBIR work may be made without further competition.

DAF DTO BOA

Order through the DAF Digital Transformation Office Basic Ordering Agreement.

Not sure?

We’ll walk through which pathway fits the program. Contact us →